 ,,




























-
-





# )(






'







# note that  is slang... [3] spells it as '...







-











# -    " 
















'






-
-




#  is considered infantile language -  (pl. of ) is the proper word






























-
-


# I don't know why the following has kubuts, but [3] says that...


























#   "". woo     ,   
#       




# The following are strange inflections of the Arameic word "".
# [2] and [3] lists those bizarre inflections. Strangely, "", a word
# I found in the papers, is not considered a correct word. I commented out
# the ones that I never saw actually used.
# 


# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 

######   ) ,    ,   (.
# )" - (










# )" - (


















# )" -   (


















# )" - (









# )" - (


# )" - (
# )" - (




# )" - (






# )" - (



# )" - (



# ) (















# ) (





######  :
# ) (










# ) , (






# ) , (












# ) (















# ) (

# ) (

# note that [3] doesn't recognize , only ...





###### words from wolig.dat with additional he hamegama...









# See Academia's rules on why  is spelled with one yud. For ,
# that is my guess (based on the explicit rule to spell ).


######  


#















###### , ,  

































-

-
'













######    )   (:
###### ) ,  -(
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
# ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
#  not recognized by [2], but it is a common name.
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
#    ,   )   ...(
#         --   -wolig.dat,
#     . : , , , , .
#             -,
#     .          
#  -   , ,  ) !(
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
#
######   - :
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
######         ,  
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
###### :





















































































#  and its inflections are in wolig.dat








#  and its inflections are in wolig.dat

#  and its inflections are in wolig.dat



-


-
###### :
























######  ) (:
#            -wolig.dat
#what's the correct spelling?
 ,
 ,
 ,
#    ...
#
#
######   :
#    ,  ,  '  " ,  
#   "":
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
#
 
 
 
 
 
 ,
###### :
#       ) ...(  -wolig.dat  .


###### :
# ,
# ,
 ,
" ,
" ,
#" ,
#" ,
" ,
" ,
" ,
" ,
" ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,

 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
 ,
###### :




"

######  ':















































###   :













































'





# should I add these herbs?
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
# 
######  )       -wolig.dat

'


######  :
# TODO: is it correct that the plural of " - " (and similar for all other
# acronyms)?
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
# I don't know why [3] decided the official spellings " vs. "...
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
#" is   , but is too easily confused with "...
#"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
##### :
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
##### :
'
'
'
